Susan Estrich is not very bright… cannot understand the Bradley Effect
There’s yet more evidence coming to light that certain leftist radicals (especially those in their dotage) such as Susan Estrich simply don’t understand the basics of the reality they should be perceiving. In the article linked below, our distinguished colleague Ms. Estrich claims that if Obama loses the ONLY reason possible can be racism. Forgetting for a moment that she has had that article canned and on a shelf in her basement for nearly 4 years and has been waiting… oh so eagerly waiting… to unseal it for what to her probably seemed like (or was) a lifetime … let’s take a look at it and then point out the obvious; that Susan Estrich (and much of the mainstream Obama media machine) can’t do much figgerin” (or more likely, they craftily prefer to hoodwink others into a false reality);
http://www.creators.com/opinion/susan-estrich/the-final-days-2008-10-31.html
Now, if you prefer to emerge from the false reality of the Obama Matrix, here is the truth. If Obama loses, it is because he was always behind, and the polls were a lie. A lie that was fabricated by a media machine manically intent on skewing an election in favor of its liberal leanings. Not conspracy much? Well then, the polls were a lie that was innocently fabricated by the polled… who were too bashful to say, “hell yes I’ll be voting for McCain.” Either way, they were a lie. A falsity. A nothing. Nada. Zip. Meaningless. (I can hear John King of the Collectivist News Network crying into his Chardonnay now, “If the polls are a lie, how can I say Obama has clinched the election 5 days before it happens?”)
But, I digress:
First, that lie ain’t racism; it is created by FEAR of being CALLED a racist by a well-meaning, but bigoted reporter or pollster (likely a leftist/collectivist). The so called “Bradley Effect” does not describe racist people, but rather kind, fearful people, who react dishonestly to protect themselves from a perceived threat (media bigotry). This is a fact that is rarely understood.
Second, who is most likely to lie to create the Bradley Effect? Is it a hard-line Republican? NO! The liars are independents and democrats who, out of FEAR, lie to their fellow independents and democrats about secreting away a benedictian vote for the only reasonable choice in the election… the centrist, John McCain! Of course, the bigoted pollster or reporter is trained to characterize reason as racism in 2008. Welcome to the liberal future. Welcome to Obama’s America.
So, let’s summarize the TRUTH that Ms. Estrich can’t seem to (or prefers not to) fathom. If McCain wins, what truly happened was that either (1) devious and bigoted liberal reporters and pollsters, OR (2) fearful democrat leaning lies created the false impression that Obama was ever ahead in the first place. Of course, saavy and astute observers of American politics know that this lie was conceived soon after the 2004 democrat convention (after Obama’s coming-out speech), and has been carefully planned and dutifully fulfilled by a complicit media machine every day for 4 years. In light of that drumbeat, it is a wonder that there is anyone left “outside the Matrix.”
The underlying reasonable explanation to an Obama loss is that it had always been that way, and it was always to be that way. And in almost any nation on Earth it makes sense that a radical liberal would lose to a centrist (yes, even now as the quiet sleep of Socialism creeps upon us). But, that doesn’t fit the script. American is racist. America is bad. American should be guilty. You should be guilty. You should vote against reason to make up for your guilt.
Write your own script. We have no guilt, except for our own failures to ourselves. We are individuals - with no color, no type, and no groupism. We only control our own actions - and should not want to control the peaceful behavior of others.
Did Chuck Schumer Cause the Impending Global Financial Collapse?
Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York, has been accused of causing the collapse of Indymac Bank; at the time it was the second biggest bank failure in American history. Of course, he has denied that, by publicly disclosing a letter questioning the financial stability of Indymac, he caused the run that resulted in its failure and takeover by federal authorities. Now, what we know is that Senator Schumer serves on both the Senate Finance Committee and the Senate Banking Committee, and in the eleven days after he disclosed his letter, there was a run on Indymac that resulted in the withdraw of more than $1.3 billion dollars and a collapse of the institution. It turns out it was only a pebble compared to the avalanche that has followed; but a crucial pebble indeed.
So, while the complexity of the current situation may not lend itself to an easy root-cause analysis, it is natural to look for a sine qua non. For those people that keep a close eye on daily events and have an open, inquisitive mind, it is at least interesting to pose the question whether Senator Chuck Schumer’s actions were the catalyst that enabled a quicker, easier, and much more widespread slide into global recession (either inadvertently, or perhaps as part of a larger agenda). Such folks might also ask themselves (perhaps rhetorically) whether or not Mr. Schumer (et.al.) will now stand offering the “helping hand” of government to assist those impacted by the firestorm of events that followed and led us to this crisis (isn’t that… everyone?). Given that outcome, and the self-aggrandizing nature of leftist policies and actions, one may ultimately be led to question the initial motivations of this Senator from New York, or at least to ponder whether he was (perhaps unwittingly) the spark.
2 Million Minutes - How Will America Transform its Education System?
Two Million Minutes… and does your high schooler have a second to waste? If they’re being publicly educated in America, chances are they’re wasting more than you know…